Demo Manufacturing Group
Proof of production.
Structured for trust.
TrustStream turns factory proof, buyer review, and dispute evidence into one operating surface. The current repository now contains the industrial-grade architecture baseline, schema draft, delivery breakdown, and a working web shell for the first product sprint.
Core closed-loop routes
6
Landing, login, dashboard, order detail, capture, buyer review.
Operational backends
2
Demo mode today, Supabase mode when credentials are configured.
Commercial proof states
6
Draft through approved and rejected with audit-ready transitions.
Why this shape
The best first version is a trust workflow product
The system should not start as a giant marketplace or a fully live media network. The first commercially sane build is a controlled workflow that proves source, packages evidence, and records buyer action.
Source proof, not marketing polish
TrustStream treats production proof as structured evidence. The product package is designed to make sample approval, packaging review, and shipment readiness easier to prove.
Buyer review with control
Overseas buyers receive a dedicated review surface instead of a messy chat trail. That makes approval cleaner, faster, and easier to revisit later.
Evidence chain for management
Factory leaders need one place to see what was recorded, what was shared, what the buyer did, and what still lacks operational closure.
System modules
The repository is already shaped around the real product boundaries
Each module below is mapped to a dedicated surface or domain concern so future work can remain focused and commercially coherent.
Capture surface
Web-first for now, mini-program-ready by design. Capture, challenge, location, and upload all belong here.
Buyer portal
Public, secure, and server-mediated. This is where proof is consumed, reviewed, and approved.
Evidence ledger
Hashing, audit events, structured order context, and lifecycle records become the product moat.
Command dashboard
The paying user needs operational visibility more than raw media. Dashboard clarity is part of retention.
Anti-fraud posture
The initial system is already designed around layered trust controls
This is where the product wins. Factories do not pay for file upload alone. They pay for control over source proof, buyer review, and defensible evidence.
Factory identity package
passingFactory name, legal entity binding, approved site anchor, and operator-side proof controls should be presented as one trust package instead of isolated claims.
Geofence-bound capture
passingCapture sessions must originate from an approved site perimeter or escalate to manual review.
Dynamic proof challenge
passingEach capture is paired with a short-lived visual challenge code to reduce replay risk.
Server-mediated buyer route
passingBuyer review links are mediated by the app layer, risk-scored, rate-limited, and escalated into the fraud review queue when abuse thresholds are crossed.
Hashed share token storage
passingPublic review tokens should be stored as one-way hashes so leaked database rows do not expose live buyer links.
Buyer decision idempotency
passingPublic approval should be single-write unless an explicit internal reset flow exists. Replays and duplicate submissions must not overwrite prior evidence.
Retention policy control
passingRetention windows, buyer PII minimization rules, and identity downgrade impact are now governed in-app, but automatic lifecycle execution is still pending.
Build order
Delivery lanes are now explicit
The project should move in lanes, not random feature bursts. This keeps the team honest about what is foundational, what is commercially essential, and what can wait.
Foundation
Establish architecture, domain types, environment handling, schema ownership, and service boundaries.
- Architecture baseline written
- Atomic implementation breakdown written
- Supabase schema drafted
- Service abstraction introduced
Core workflow
Create the smallest valuable production path from order creation to buyer approval.
- Authentication and tenant bootstrap
- Order creation
- Share link issuance
- Buyer decision capture
Capture client
Provide a low-friction operator surface and preserve anti-fraud controls.
- Responsive capture page
- Geofence check
- Proof challenge display
- Mini program API contract
Roadmap
The next three phases are already sequenced
This keeps the project from jumping ahead into shiny features before the first valuable workflow is genuinely working.
Phase A
Industrial-grade foundation with product shell and data model clarity.
Phase B
Commercial MVP workflow from order creation to buyer approval.
Phase C
Operational hardening, capture client rollout, and subscription control.
Operational reality
The hard part is not the idea. It is the path from proof capture to buyer action with evidence quality still intact.
This repository now gives you the system frame, the schema, the atomic task map, and the first demo-grade product shell. The next execution focus should be authentication, tenant bootstrap, order creation, and approval submission.
Sprint snapshot
Architecture and task breakdown are now codified inside the repo.
The schema draft is ready for Supabase implementation.
The web shell now shows the admin and buyer-facing surfaces.